Skip to content

[Service Bus] Improve errors and update API docs as per the feedback from UX study#11592

Merged
ShivangiReja merged 3 commits intoAzure:masterfrom
ShivangiReja:UXStudy_Feedback
Apr 27, 2020
Merged

[Service Bus] Improve errors and update API docs as per the feedback from UX study#11592
ShivangiReja merged 3 commits intoAzure:masterfrom
ShivangiReja:UXStudy_Feedback

Conversation

@ShivangiReja
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

  • Improve error message when user attempts to settle a peeked message.
  • Update ServiceBusSender docs by making it clear that it can be used for session entities.
  • Update Processor docs by including that this is used for receiving messages, not sending messages.
  • Include default ReceiveMode in more places in documentation.
  • Add ClientBuilderExtensions to be used for dependency injection.

@ShivangiReja ShivangiReja self-assigned this Apr 25, 2020
@ShivangiReja ShivangiReja added Service Bus Client This issue is related to a non-management package labels Apr 25, 2020
Comment thread sdk/servicebus/Azure.Messaging.ServiceBus/src/Sender/ServiceBusSender.cs Outdated
Comment thread sdk/servicebus/Azure.Messaging.ServiceBus/src/Client/ServiceBusClient.cs Outdated
Comment thread sdk/servicebus/Azure.Messaging.ServiceBus/src/Client/ServiceBusClient.cs Outdated
/// </summary>
private void ThrowIfLockTokenIsEmpty(string lockToken)
{
if (Guid.Parse(lockToken) == Guid.Empty)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!

Comment thread sdk/servicebus/Azure.Messaging.ServiceBus/src/Client/ServiceBusClient.cs Outdated
Comment thread sdk/servicebus/Azure.Messaging.ServiceBus/src/Processor/ServiceBusProcessor.cs Outdated
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Client This issue is related to a non-management package Service Bus

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants